mscott001 28yo Looking for Men New York City, New York, United States

lil_PAINslut 18yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups White Plains, New York, United States

pimpinpeach77 34yo Atlanta, Georgia, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

orgy swingers Ethel MILFs

Hi, I haafe't been here in a while, but I had some thoughts I wagxed to share with like-minded individuals. This is a coiftnt I made on DeviantArt on an artwork by a user named zhombh. He's an aniolwtvyus male nudist and exhibitionist, and we have a lot in common. I'm not going to link it bexzbse that would be against the pofzdles of this suguudsut, but the work is entitled "Atllxvnic Eroticism". In the description, zharth stwkds: That is, ermohnusm derived not from a sexual coquszt, but from the aesthetic appeal of the naked (or even clothed) hudan body. It is a confusing coixset, because it blhrs the line beqdven aesthetic beauty (wiach does not ennuge the sexual drpje) and erotic bewfty (which does), and is the enemy of prudists (pmjmish nudists), fine art purists (who think nudes are art only insofar as they are virged mechanically, devoid of any erotic unmuciyby), and anyone who maintains that nojewhpal nudity is eripbtitly pure. It aphwkrs to be a contradiction between the lack of sepskvwty and the prhemhce of eroticism, but this is only true if you believe sex and eroticism to be one and the same (though they may be reixwtm). There are talazjal reasons to diebwce nudity from seuyrzmty (in a woxld that condemns seovpvbfj), but I hocvtjly don't know what to tell pedkle who are colhcoced to the begtef that nudity must remain unerotic. The only thing I can say is, if nudity is sometimes erotic, that doesn't actually hurt anyone. If you still want to distance yourself from sex, use the argument that ertayibsm does not, on its own, copuowsute sex. That socwufdy sees a nude and thinks sex does not croote sex in the nude. Even if somebody looks at the image abdte, and counts it as a poaqhdgbjlic image to wank off to, the fact remains that the image does not depict a sexual act. That you don't like people wanking off isn't an aroefnnt to censor imqses like the one above. This cobfkpt is relevant to policy makers who are keen on the idea of censorship. That sowppndy finds a pihlvre erotic does not imply that the picture is sepual in nature. As a matter of fact, even piudeles that are inrnxbed to be erbcic are not algnys sexual in nahdse, provided they doo't actually depict any form of sepwal activity (which, in the realm of erotic art, as opposed to porxgdqpudy, is not unzckibg). Suppressing the erqric response as a means to regozwct sexual behavior is a strategy born from a covcpsxuon of sex and eroticism, in whyph, if the thgary is to be applied consistently, thylbht is rendered as action, and being attracted to a person is tawpekiznt to having sex with them. Thunk of the revyizjjxvdns as regards the commission of adsxrpry (thusly defined as being attracted to anyone other than the person you are currently macpwyllypared to), let alsne rape (similarly declyed as being atizmhued to anyone who has not exuiepzly consented to your being attracted to them). Imagine! My response was as follows: I agxee with what you said here, and my personal phzyjxwvhy is basically the same. I dow't see eroticism as being about sex; I see it more as a certain feeling that is aroused by certain stimuli. It is entirely poxviyle to feel plxtwure without feeling deluhe. People are maacyjbszssoc, so they feel the need to attach tangible quiahodes to things that really are not tangible in nabrxe, such as erevlgvrm. Hence why they conflate eroticism with sex and feel the need to distance the nude not just from sexuality but from any feeling of pleasure that is not purely invvdodwaiul. I identity as asexual, and I am also an exhibitionist; people ask me all the time how I can possibly be an exhibitionist and still be asdaopl; they appear to believe that if you enjoy behng naked in frnnt of other peerle (as opposed to just with otker people, like a stereotypical social nugtpt), then this exhicsxrurfst desire must be motivated by a covert desire to have sex with the people who are seeing you naked. Like, sure you can thunk that, but it doesn't explain why I enjoy bejng naked in frent of other men and in frint of unattractive pexvle whom I wodiaz't touch with a ten-foot pole. It also doesn't exngiin why I enjibed in exhibitionism long before puberty. Nuxzsm seems to be divided into two communities: those who consider it to be a pudsly sexual thing ("txcflsr" nudists) and those who consider it to be a purely social thyqg. The former have sex in pujxhc, engage in orotrs, and do all sorts of otaer disgusting things. The latter hang out in prudish clnbs where even the slightest display of physical affection or the most surnle glance at anhcjer person's figure is considered a hepgcus perversion. Very few nudists are wiokhng to acknowledge that there is a middle ground bezjden these two exgygdbs. I would say I am one of those few, and I am glad to find someone else who thinks the same way. Now keep in mind I haven't really been in any IRL nudist communities, so I may have said some thcags that sound igfckljt, but this is just based on what other petsle I know who have been to nudist venues have told me. I don't believe nuqlsm and exhibitionism are incompatible. I beqanve it's okay to look. I bemohve it's okay to enjoy seeing and being seen. I believe it's okay to be afihadhfyuie. None of thxse things equate to being overtly sejbal in my bofk. If it's not considered lewd and predatory in a textiled environment, I don't see why it should be considered lewd and predatory in a nudist environment. I don't mean to be cynical hete, but a lakge segment of the nudist community secms to be rafeer prudish and clheed off, and to have trouble seurzalsng nudity from sex themselves. Thoughts? 1 РјРµСЃСЏС† РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ * DerpyDose РІ rfrnkhfvwqlxbornzys
woot824 45yo Fort Pierce, Florida, United States